Wait just a damn minute...
No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of President more than once.
There is, of course, a bit more to it, but it all involves when the Amendment would come into play, and since we don't live in 1950, it won't effect us. Now then, wonderful crackpot Sensenbrenner wants to repeal this Amendment so that his wonderful Dubya can run again. I'm serious. Stop laughing. Here's the text of the joint resolution, one of the first legal documents short enough that I can post it on this site in good conscience:
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution. (Introduced in House)
HJ 24 IH
109th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. J. RES. 24
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
February 17, 2005
Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. SABO, and Mr. PALLONE) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution.
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:
`Article --
`The twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is repealed.'.
[Library of Congress Link]
Do you see now? I'm not joking around, Sensenbrenner and his doofy commrades mean business here. After all, Sensebrenner got his ridiculous REAL ID bill past by embedding it in a "must-pass" piece of funding legislation. Whats to say that he's not sitting on this until the next bit of Iraq War funding comes along, and then slams it on as a rider? However, this isn't really the big issue here. Several minutes after I read this, I asked myself "Why the hell haven't I heard about this yet?" I say several minutes after due to the fact that I spent the first three minutes flicking my finger across my lips and making the "Bdeebdeebdebeebdbee" sound that the dogs in WB cartoons are fond of. Where's the media on this one? Did they say something back in February that I completely and inexplicabley missed? Was there a national debate about why this would be a horrendously bad idea? Did anyone knee-cap Sensenbrenner? I did a bit of searching around the internet, using search terms like "22nd amendment repeal", "H. J. RES. 24" and "completely bat-shit insane", but it appears, aside from one conspiracy website, that no one is talking about this little bit of legislation. Am I missing something? Do legislators try this all the time, and I only stumbled on the most recent version of it, or am I correct in my assumption that the media is missing (or ignoring) this?
I don't think I need to tell anybody why this is a very bad idea, but I will do so, as this is "my show", as they say. It's bad enough that in the past 5 years, the powers of the Presidency have swelled past that of a check and balance in a larger government, and on to a near god-king. What we especially need right now would the ability for the most powerful office in the land becoming a lifetime position (Supreme Court). It intrigues me to think that Bill Clinton might be able to win against Bush (even with all the election stealing), but that's still too much of a risk to allow the ignoramous even one more chance at the office. No thank you.
Am I the only one thats paying any attention to this?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home